>>4313486
Neg film has most of its latitude/dynamic range on the highlight side. So over exposing by 1ev and developing normally usually helps the shadows and grain without blowing highlights. Sometimes anons do this on purpose. (E6 is more critical with less DR so it's important to nail exposure and shoot at box speed or just slightly over.)

That said, as other anons have pointed out its truly an ISO 1000 film designed to be pushed up to 3200. So you're not actually even over exposing it. It's expired so giving it more light is good. You might even want to shoot/develop as ISO 800 film. Or shoot as 800 and push to 1600.

>>4313627
Why?

>>4313627
cant afford a roll of foma? your first roll came back entirely blank?

>>4313488
People posting individual threads is how chan culture was supposed to work before that faggot moot ruined it by explicitly allowing generals and letting them take over. Oldfags remember when generals were not welcome. And they still aren’t.

>>4313939
>>4313972
you fuck dogs
>>4314219
based

You will make absolutely no money, no matter how good you are. You'd be lucky to sell a handful of two dollar pictures per month. Don't waste your time.
Also, didn't read after the first sentence

Every photo worthy of selling have already been taken decades ago

>>4314213
it also doesnt force that awful fucking bullshit form factor on people like we all have arthritis.

>>4314213
>muh fps muh 6mp
>no global shitter - bendorific readout
>no superior e mount ecosystem just bloated junk that somehow vignettes more than sony lenses

>>4314239
>we all have arthritis
speak for yourself snoyboomer
>>4314243
>superior e mount ecosystem
yeah the r1 would have really enjoyed that 15fps from those 3rd party lenses on that 60fps body

>>4314254
native sony lenses are the best on the market and brutally mog all cannot and niggor junk. 1.4 and 1.2 GMs are without equal. every lens sony releases somehow ends up the sharpest and smallest a lens in its class has ever been. meanwhile the fuckhuge rf 1.2s vignette more and are softer - how?

>>4314261
The biggest drawbacks with the 50 1.2 is the chromatic aberrations and somewhat slow focusing motor otherwise I haven't seen much to indicate that snoy makes better products.

File: p4.jpg (519 KB, 900x1200)

519 KB JPG

>>4313341
this might be better

File: IMG_3976.jpg (4.97 MB, 4000x6000)

4.97 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6400
Camera Software	ILCE-6400 v2.00
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	30 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:15 15:25:23
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/16.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	500
Lens Aperture	f/16.0
Brightness	9.2 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	20.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4000
Image Height	6000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4313974
of course they all come to life when you go up the stairs
looks like a pretty high cr encounter

>>4313977
Cr?

File: dt_CRW_3185.jpg (1.27 MB, 1148x2297)

1.27 MB JPG

>>4314158
https://slyflourish.com/what_does_cr_mean.html
They're small, but pack tactics and they surely have some resistances.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon DIGITAL IXUS 960 IS
Camera Software	darktable 4.6.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.9
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	36 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:05:16 05:54:03
Exposure Time	299/200000 sec
F-Number	f/2.9
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	74
Lens Aperture	f/2.9
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	65.54 m
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	7.70 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1148
Image Height	2297

>>4314088
>>If you're using your camera to get laid you are fucking pathetic
Excuse me sir, but if i’m up to me nuts in guts, you can think i’m pathetic as ya want and i d n g a single f. And bitch plz, a camera id no different than any other object. Using any object to get laid is the best possible use of that thing. If a pencil sharpener utterly fails to sharpen graphite but leads me to irrigate some pretty girls lower intestines with baby batter, then that is the very finest pencil sharpener ever and i will remember it fondly. Get your priorities straight, love people any way you can, then worry about your toys you sad nihilistic antisex fuck.

https://youtu.be/nVmXsBNfwHY&t=67

>>4314161
>Sticking your dick in shit
Wow, what an achievement.

>>4314262
You would understand why it's an achievement if you've seen the photos he posts of himself.

>>4314161
>>4314266
Wait, is this still Sugar?

>>4311499
shot with what

>>4309205

Man photos of all the office workers in rush hour are so depressing, giving me bad memories OP of packed public transport on Monday morning with every single person looking miserable.

Anyway your problem is simple, swap to shooting naked women and all your problems will be fixed, you are grinding out that job for something right?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCehccEZzX4

why don't you read the creative act by rick ruben you turtle's cock

>>4313956
>swap to shooting naked women and all your problems will be fixed,
Anon you make it sound so simple, I know we all want to do this but getting women to actually agree is impossible unless you pay them. And the ones who will do it for pay aren’t necessarily the ones you want to shoot naked so better off just necking myself metaphorically I guess.

>>4314221
nta but you just have to start being around the right (wrong) women. ime very liberal women and any woman who self-identities as an 'artist' or part of the lgbt stuff. Love the idea generally. I think it's because they want the attention, same as every woman, but if it's artistic nudes they feel released from the shame of it being strictly pornographic. They are, however, insufferable people to be around, so pick your poison I guess

>>4313130
For me it's commercial signs ads and billboards everywhere on the background
Makes it look like a teletubby world.
Modern cars too

File: IMG_0019.jpg (3.75 MB, 4032x3024)

3.75 MB JPG

>>4312296
Very true observation, cars are priced in a way that normal people can't afford them. Then there are many people that can afford them but don't want them.

>>4313137
>>4313138
Yes, in a way. Cybertrucks are butt ugly but at least they are a unique design. It's a risky and different design decision. For that fact it should be applauded.

>>4313247
Based, I always love when people decide to take photos of my car at shows.

>>4313688
Not at all. Even two different models from the same manufacturer model year line up will look more different than most of these.

Picrel is mine, bought as a Zoomer. I suppose I have a degree of say in the matter.


Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>4313838
thats brock fuckin sampson, thats who.

>>4313665
Get out Mehmet, no one likes your Nardo Audi.

>>4312283
this is bait but literally correct. it's funny because it's not just "old is better" i actually think 09-14 cars look great as well. it's specifically 2002-2008 and then 2015-now.

>>4313623
Amazing! Just this little black shit on the lower edge bothers me. In the right third.

Other than that amazing colours and nightsky.

File: DSC_2835.jpg (1.51 MB, 4928x3264)

1.51 MB JPG

From Northern IL. We waited for almost 3 hours before it finally showed up

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7000
Camera Software	Adobe Bridge 2020 (Windows)
Photographer	AJM
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	30 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:05:12 08:46:09
Exposure Time	2 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	20.00 mm
Image Width	4928
Image Height	3264
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: DSC_2849.jpg (4.31 MB, 4928x3264)

4.31 MB JPG

>>4313991
pink came out a little later

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7000
Camera Software	Adobe Bridge 2020 (Windows)
Photographer	AJM
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	30 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:05:12 08:52:08
Exposure Time	4 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	20.00 mm
Image Width	4928
Image Height	3264
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: IMG_2050s.jpg (4.37 MB, 3200x2133)

4.37 MB JPG

Meh. My colors look a bit washed out. I think I pushed the ISO speed up to the camera's limit.
I screwed up and left tripod parts behind at home, so this is hand-held. 4 second exposure is all that my poor, palsied hands can manage.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 70D
Lens Size	18.00 - 55.00 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.1.1
Lens Name	EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:15 15:34:38
Exposure Time	4 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	12800
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	18.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3200
Image Height	2133
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Spot
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	AI Servo
Drive Mode	Unknown
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	384
Color Matrix	135

>>4314174
Your white balance is wrong. Do 3200-3850k no tint.

>>4310830
“Divide by 4” is a myth anyway and Bayer sensors resolve to their Nyquist limits unless you literally cover the lens with a sharp cutoff filter matched to one of the CFA peaks. (Yes, I’ve done that experiment.)

>>4314030
Sorry anon, laying in bed sick and responding to shit. You’re probably right.

>>4314030
As an emu fucker (aka emussy enjoyer) I am disgusted by these people sharing my hobby.

>>4314030
>dog fuckers who have near-daily sex with their dogs
Is it even love if you don't do it several times a day?

>>4314030
Untrue. Some of us make our wives & daughters do it.
and some of us make your daughters do it when they show up to our shoots to “model”.

>>4312819
It's a medium, with a message. It's either effective or not. Stop being an obtuse tard.

>>4312817
whats this called?

>>4312858
painting. They used to do it before photography

>>4309912
i think you just have a boring life in a boring town, thats all
get around more and more more interesting pics

>>4312817
is there a fujifilm recipe for this?

File: ip5pIG4.jpg (396 KB, 2048x1365)

396 KB JPG

>>4311142
Here is one of my cat.

>>4311049
>>4305573
best in thread agreed
>>4311143
thank you cat anon

>>4311142
>Home Photography thread
>you guys should go outside
You're not very smart, are you?

File: PB034097.jpg (1.97 MB, 3888x3888)

1.97 MB JPG

why not

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OLYMPUS CORPORATION
Camera Model	E-M1MarkII
Camera Software	OM Workspace 2.2.1W
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Color Filter Array Pattern	17660
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2023:11:03 17:49:11
Exposure Time	0.8 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3888
Image Height	3888
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4314059
What are the wipes for?

File: 20240512_183200_javasabr_(...).jpg (4.54 MB, 3984x2984)

4.54 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Google
Camera Model	SM-S918W
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Color Filter Array Pattern	672
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	14 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:15 01:04:16
Exposure Time	1/1600 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
ISO Speed Rating	50
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	9.0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	4.93 m
Flash	No Flash Function
Focal Length	2.20 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
White Balance	Auto
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

File: 20240512_183606_javasabr_(...).jpg (4.91 MB, 2695x3599)

4.91 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Google
Camera Model	SM-S918W
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.9
Color Filter Array Pattern	672
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	230 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:15 01:04:33
Exposure Time	1/120 sec
F-Number	f/4.9
ISO Speed Rating	50
Lens Aperture	f/4.9
Brightness	7.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	5.16 m
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	27.20 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
White Balance	Auto
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

File: 20240513_181503_javasabr_(...).jpg (3.28 MB, 2714x2714)

3.28 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Google
Camera Model	SM-S918W
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Color Filter Array Pattern	672
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	67 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:15 01:56:29
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/2.4
ISO Speed Rating	50
Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Brightness	6.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	2.72 m
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	7.90 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
White Balance	Auto
Subject Distance Range	Close View

File: Snapchat-1241763057~2-01.jpg (1.44 MB, 3358x2562)

1.44 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:05:15 00:51:17
Image Width	3358
Image Height	2562

File: 1715793452862.jpg (1.64 MB, 2779x3706)

1.64 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	SM-S908U1
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.0.0 (Android)
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	230 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2779
Image Height	3706
Image Orientation	Unknown
Image Created	2024:04:21 20:06:21
Lens Aperture	f/4.9
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Color Space Information	sRGB
Focal Length	27.20 mm
Exposure Time	1/500 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/4.9

>>4306463
Beautiful brotha

>>4295517
Would 275mm be okay?

>>4296531
Thats the best image ive seen on 4chan since i got here in 07. Fuck yes. Would provide 1 quality fuck of ur choice in gratitude for sharing that. God damn.

>>4313873
Yeah, sure, it's a long focal length. Although depends on what you're planning to shoot. I'd get something longer for birds, but 275mm is fine for general telephoto fun.

>>4313926
It's a 1040mm lens for my 4x5 camera, so it may work if I crop a little.

I think I want to try using it for architectural, landscape, and maybe portraits.

File: 02020010.jpg (2.51 MB, 3090x2048)

2.51 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 6.10.011 (130930)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3090
Image Height	2048

File: 07440013.jpg (3.19 MB, 3090x2048)

3.19 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 6.10.011 (130930)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3090
Image Height	2048

>>4286776
Define “low light.” I grabbed a Canon R6 because it can do 4k24 with a f/1.4 lens by near full moonlight. Full moon you can do 4k60. Which means you can easily do hand held by the same at a lower ISO (IBIS for slower shutter).

It’s actually overkill for most urban night shots though. Vegas as an example, you can get away with ISO 3200 no IS and 800 with IS. While I love FF, you can do most low light stuff with a modern aps-c and f/1.4 or f/2 lens, especially with IS.

>>4313218
No idea where you’re getting that impression of IBIS, it’s good for 4-5 stops on my R6 by itself, 6 with OIS, in the UWA to mild tele range, no leaning against anything. It kicks ass for non-IS glass.

But yes a tripod is the cheapest way to do low light assuming subject motion isn’t an issue. In that case you can even do film.

>>4314010
"low light" the way say, fujislugs do it, by just underexposing SOOC instead of overexposing to pull to taste and accepting copious amounts of motion blur, can be done on anything.

however stopping motion with thorough exposure and the lowest ISO you can manage requires FF+ and truly fast glass.
there's also the "equivalence is fucking fake thing"
>no equivalence between bayer and xtranny - bayer is superior in every way
>significantly larger pixels? no equivalence
>higher resolution? no equivalence
>video? larger pixels or higher resolution AND oversampled 4k = mogs crop hard