I don’t own an 85 yet, is 0.8f really worth 4times the price?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution216 dpiVertical Resolution216 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1284Image Height1268
>>4306832you wouldnt?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D700Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern794Focal Length (35mm Equiv)55 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2022:05:25 17:40:18Exposure Time1/2500 secF-Numberf/1.2Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1000Lens Aperturef/1.2Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length55.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width3540Image Height2832RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4306835No, I bought a $100 lens to take snapshits of my dog. (Tamron 85mm f/1.8 VC, Nikon D800)[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>4306851Good man
>>4296528It is, wanting a "soft" lens for any subject is a meme for people high on fucking copium or deliberately wanting a visibly soft image not in focus. Usually for some meme artsy shit.If you stop over baking images with post-process sharpening which literally highlights subtle textures and draws rings around it, "local contrast" which emphasizes any redness or gradients, and any other form of "slider" that retards who use Adobe software use all the time, you want a sharp lens.Optical sharpness is the goal. Always has been, always will be.Stop applying fake sharpness and you'll see how soft optics usually are, and then you'll be able to appreciate TRUE sharpness, from sharp glass, when you can simply not apply the fake shit.There's literally no such thing as too sharp.All instances of such a thing (and I mean ALL) where people even reference lenses being "too sharp" are always from retards looking at baked images. They're usually using Adobe software with sliders cranked up (defaults, btw) or they have sharpening enabled that they're not even aware of like with Adobe's "capture sharpening" bullshit that they might be oblivious to.Everyone crying about stuff being too sharp is always busted for being an overbaked faggot if any research is done.For example, anyone using dehaze/"local contrast"/curves/enhancements.
Get this, pay 300, thank me later.
Bros, what's the best camera for normal people?I just want the usualy normie stuff, landscapes, pics of family and friends or selfies with them and close objects. Perhaps there's also a video function.Ideally a compact one that fits in bags or even my pocket.
>>4308451>Prices in leaf bucksConvert it to currency people can understand like a normal person, nobody cares about your fake dollars. Or at least use CAD, $ is just confusing.
>>4309382A) A6100 with 16-50 kit lens for $474B) A6400 with 16-50 kit lens + Sigma 16mm f1.4 for $984.C) A6600 with Sony E35mm f1.8 OSS + Rode Videomicro mic for $948
>>4307572for a normie, it will shit in lowlight without using the built in flash or tripod. the upside with the D80 is with an SB-600, off camera flash with the commander mode is where it shines, aside from having muh 'CCD' sensor.
>>4307376Buy a Sony phone. What's the issue here?
>>4307274I got a Lumix TZ110 and love it. Fixed screen so selfies the olde fashioned way, but not something I'd ever do. Oh, you can put it on something and control it from your phone, but that's not exactly spontaneous. Good price, shoots RAW, really nice pics, fits in a pocket. I use a Magfilter to attach a polarising filter. Not sure what else to say, it's just a great wee camera.
Which lens should I pick up after the nifty fifty?I have a Canon R8, not opposed to EF lenses though. I'm enjoying shooting with the 50mm but want to expand my horizons a bit. Been thinking about grabbing an 85mm...would you go with the RF 85 f2 or the EF 85 f1.8? Is an 85mm forcing me into doing strictly portraiture? There's also a Samyang 14mm f2.8 for a reasonable price near me. Is manual focus that much of a hassle to shoot with? Idk, what are your thoughts /p/?Pic is an image I took with my 50mm 1.8
>>4308054>nifty fiftyjust wide angle with a crop, unless you want muh blurrrs n shieet which is cringe if overdonethe distortion is related to distance, not focal length
>>4309850just get a Hasselblad H6D-100 with the 24mm and you can have every focal length that you want!
desu I only ever use my 24 f2.8 these days
>>4310893What kind of stuff do you shoot?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 25.3 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:01 22:19:44Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width4150Image Height4505
>>4308057>35 1.8Underrated lens. Same with the 28 2.8.
Got a good bonus at work and decided to finally retire my Canon 6D. Will be going Sony after seeing what the mirrorless landscape looks like with CaNikon.Canon, makes decent bodies and fantastic lenses, that R8 is probably the best entry level FF camera you can get. Still gatekeeping RF mount and will no doubt cripple R bodies to protect the cinema line. Lenses are probably the best but almost double the price of Snoys in my meme country.Nikon, feels the best to me in hand and I really like the RAWs the most. Menus and AF settings make the most sense but no real Z mount 16-35 f2.8 equivalent and the pro-grade 50mm being the size of a 24-70 is a big loss since those are my two most lenses.Sony, looks like the logical choice. Bodies have everything you could need crammed into them, native lenses are a good balance between perfect optical quality and being corrected by software means I don't carry around any too big or heavy. I like being able to buy an A7S/FX3 in the future if I wanted to get serious with vid. Colors/skin tones don't seem to be oversharpened/saturated like before. Ergonomics aren't the best and you do get the stigma of being another zoomer buying a Sony to shoot zoomer things but hey, it is what it is.Pic related, hopefully me with my Snoy A7IV.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6000Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2015:09:08 16:17:54Exposure Time1/100 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating2000Lens Aperturef/2.8Brightness-2.4 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length16.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4307214And you won’t need to buy a video-centric body if you get a Z8.
>>4307195i actually prefer the look of images taken with a7iv sensor.a good/bad lens makes or breaks the image quality but no matter which lens you put on a1, the images always look digital/robotic... idk how to explain it. they look like AI made them
OP here, I got a better deal at the store on an open box A7RV so I went with it instead of the A7IV. So far I am pretty happy with my choice, I'm going camping this weekend so I'm taking it alongside the 16-35 2.8 and 70-200 2.8 GM to do some astro and landscapes.The AF is what has impressed me the most, that AI chip really works even when my subject looks away. I have a black dog and it still manages to keep the AF on its eye surrounded by black fur. The files seem great, heard that the AI chip in this helps nailing white balance and desu I've not had to manually tweak it in Lightroom. I've also shot photos of people and the skin tones seem fine, no ugly shift to yellow or green or magenta. I'm using a few profiles in LR to see what works the best.I'm also looking forward to picking up the smaller 1.4 primes down the line as well. I've got zero interest in carrying around that huge Nikkor or Cannot 1.2's so I think Snoy's approach of getting good enough optically and fixing the rest via software is good for most normies like me. Nothing really retarded stands out to me yet- menus are fine, probably if you want to customise everything then you'll not like it but I find it alright.
>>4311050>snoyKeep us updated through your HRT
>>4311052OP here, just took my Snoy CFexpress tough HRT with my AI autodilation. I am glad to finally be a real woman! No weather sealing down there with the surgery but I'll be ok!!!
pictures from a recent trip[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareCapture One WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width2048Image Height1536
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>4306718careful now Chuck Noland
>>4306716I went to Tenerife, didn't see many beaches but hiked up the highest peak in Spain.
bump I'm not letting a photo thread be pushed off by a gear thread
cool thread, anon. thanks for sharing.
Ansel Adams used to tilt the plate is his cameras in order to get his entire photo in focus at once, regardless of the depth of field. Now we all just go to the highest f stop value possible and shoot for the best. Alternatively some with set up with a tripod, and take 10 photos of the same exact scene with different focus points, and blend them all into one picture in photoshop. Others hate the concept and prefer a visual reference to the depth of field with an area clearly in focus and an area that is clearly not. This then begs the question, is focus better long range or up close?I played around with the concept a bit. I took two pictures, one just as far back as possible, and then another on the close foreground. I did this trying to see which style I liked better. Personally I like the foreground in focus, but the other person I asked preferred the shot with the background in focus. so what do you guys think? do you have a preference? Or do you like the Incel Adams "everything in focus" approach?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D610Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern850Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:04:21 14:20:47Exposure Time1/4000 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmComment452942Color Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeLandscapeGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4310643I am running canon mirrorless bodies on the back with mamiya medium format lenses….. Although I really want to grab a Fuji film GFX, but that multiplies the cost a lot…..using the setup for stop motion and Timelapse in my studio. Yeah the Cambo stuff is $$$.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeAppleCamera ModeliPhone 11 Pro MaxCamera Software16.6.1Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)26 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:11:02 23:08:36Exposure Time1/58 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/1.8Brightness1.1 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length4.25 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2462Image Height3668Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4306402https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/photography/tips-and-solutions/using-a-large-format-camera-to-make-digital-photographsSearching for these 3D printed files. I imagine they are the authors home brew. Would be cool to adapt my next technical camera.
>>4310951here is the one from the BH blog post.https://standardcameras.com/products/the-standard-4x5-2-0here's some others:https://www.printables.com/search/models?q=4x5%20camerahttps://thangs.com/search/4x5%20camera?scope=all&view=grid
>>4310622Yeah I know it’s bad. I’m just fucking around with foreground/background blur from extreme distance differences and its impact on the outcome of the photo. Neither one of these are going to be printed or published. It’s just to start a discussion of what the role of a foreground should be. A frame for the background? What if it’s the subject instead? Or is anale Adams the best answer of “fuck it everything is in focus” Which aesthetic choice do you like better? Which do you use? Can you provide examples with pictures you’ve taken?
>>4307535>Isn't this simply remarkable?nah
I have an old jpeg thats corrupted that im trying to open. The last 6 apps i've tried display the pic, but either output it as a tiny thumbnail, or heavily watermark the image to the point of ruining it. Does anyone know of an app that's free that is actually free to fix busted jpegs? Thanks, anons
>>4304711gimp?>open image>click save as
>>4306409You know nothing.When a JPEG image is corrupt, no application will open it. You need special software to repair the file as it is a heavily compressed format reliant on decompression to deliver the pixels. If something in the chain breaks, the file is "bricked" from normal programs point of view, but recovery software can detect where errors rise and you can replace bad data to fix the problems.A few bad bits can brick a JPEG. Fixing those bits will fix the file, you might lose some 8x8 blocks but the rest can be fine. GIMP won't help with this. GIMP is what you'd use after repair to then edit out the missing blocks to fill in the missing pixels.
>>4310786so far he knows more than you since he's actually recommended software that is free of charge and by your own admission is able to fix busted jpegs
>>4304301Try photorec. It might not be able to fix it but it will definitely be able to find a copy of the file within the disk that was temporarily created while moving or editing or viewing since all the software creates temp versions of files while accessing it. Chances are that at least one of the recovered copies might not be damaged
>>4310787I know English is not your first language, but consider using a translator.GIMP does not fix busted JPEGsGIMPO NO EL FIXO LA JPEGGOS PUTA MADREGIMP won't even open a busted JPEG. It just gives you an error.
I've been shooting on a Canon 5DIV for the past few years. My shutter has been sticking and instead of sending it back, figure it's time to upgrade. Before this I was a Nikon shooter with the D700/D750/D800 and really liked it but switched to Canon mainly due to the f1.2 lenses and much better customer service in my country.I rented an R5 and R6II and they were nice enough with the pro zooms and the 50 1.2 but after trying the Z8 and the small 1.8 primes, I really was reminded of what I missed about Nikon. AF was better, the camera bodies felt better and more "rugged", DR was better but in fairness comparing to a previous gen Canon R5. One thing I hated though was how hyuge the Nikon 50 1.2 was- and that's my go-to lens in any system.Is Nikon doing better now as a company in listening to their customers than they did during the DSLR days? I think I read they were overtaken by Snoy so it must be a kick to the nuts to be #3 now.
>>4299475my thoughts are that you should replace that 5D Mk 4 shutter[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D200Camera SoftwareVer.2.01Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern848Focal Length (35mm Equiv)52 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationLeft-Hand, BottomHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:05:01 14:16:58Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1936Image Height1296RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownISO Speed Used100Color ModeCOLORImage QualityNORMALWhite BalanceAUTOImage SharpeningAUTOFocus ModeAF-CFlash SettingNORMALFlash Compensation0.0 EVISO Speed Requested100Flash Bracket Compensation0.0 EVAE Bracket Compensation0.0 EVTone CompensationAUTOLens TypeNikon D SeriesLens Range35.0 mm; f/1.8Auto FocusCenterShooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/OffColor ModeMODE1Lighting TypeNATURALNoise ReductionOFFCamera Actuations6139Image OptimizationNORMALSaturation 2AUTO
>>4305599Every time I read Niggor I chuckle and makes my day just a bit better, and this one was good. Thank you anon, godspeed to you and your big black Niggor lens collection
>>4305100worked photo retail for about a decade, and from that perspective, sony had by far the best store support for my region (most sponsored events & workshops, rep visits, relatively few supply issues), greatest spif / commission paid of any of the brands, greatest employee purchase programs / discountsa lot of employees switched over around the a7II/III generations and never looked back, and the incentives to push sony are just too good
>>4305599>NIGGORKek. I want to change my lens font to this so I get a chuckle every time I look down at it.
>>4299475Nikon Electronic Format (NEF) supports lossy compression and some of their cameras have only supported that lossy output.
Pentax 645n editionPrevious thread>>4307062/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is (generally) bullshit>negative film ages better than positive>black and white better than color>slow films better than fast>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops overexposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited>slide/positive film is shot at box speed or overexposed and pulled.>if you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 processUseful linksComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4310875> What's your deepest regret in film?1. Didn’t save first negatives2. Wasted too much time/shots shooting color on the begging of my film journey 3. Wasted film with shit cameras (p&s, soviet garbage, no metering manual ones)
And here it is fellas! My first contact print of a wet plate colloidion negative I took on glass. Pretty little thing. The small shack is so crispy sharp in person. The fine detail really makes it stand out.The nikkor T ED 720mm lens is really quite nice, but a major pain to work with. I had to use 2 tripods to support my camera in the wind for my 5 second exposure.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G998U1Camera SoftwareG998U1UESAFXD1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height1800Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:06 11:09:35Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width4000Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramNormal ProgramColor Space InformationsRGBUnique Image IDXA8XLNF00SMImage Height1800Brightness8.7 EVWhite BalanceAutoExposure ModeAutoExposure Time13/10000 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/1.8ISO Speed Rating16Image Width4000Focal Length6.70 mmMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
>>4309008new bread >>4310960>>4310960>>4310960>>4310960
>>4310853idk, bellows focus, mirror lockup, leaf shutter and rotating back were both pretty useful for that photo>>4310851I think it was the 180mm, it's my favohrite lense for the camera of the 5 or so I have
>>4310892>1:16Too dim
You guys have been paying your Lightroom and photoshop subscription right?Adobe needs somebody to pay for their skip the photoshoot marketing campaign.Literally who thinks this stuff up?
>>4310795probably the same people that think regional costumes are good marketing
I make images for a living. Happy to answer any questions.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON Z 9Camera SoftwareCapture One 15 MacintoshSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating3200Lens Aperturef/6.3Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length24.00 mmImage Width2000Image Height1333RenderingCustomExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4309020Why was I so excited to buy my first camera but now it's here I never want to use it?
>>4309020why would you make a whole thread for yourself and then not share photos?at least have the decency to not be a nophoto
>>4310460Multi purpose neck strap.
>>4310520>Minolta HRTHow fitting.
>>4310514Because a camera on its own is not exciting, it’s all about what you can use it for. What did you want to photograph, what inspired you to buy the problem? If there’s no answer to that, found the problem.
>>4310146>>4310148That and I also doubt that he realises at all what is happening here. I am quite certain now that ol' zacherino is legally retarded. He just doesn't know better. It's not a choice that he ignores all and every single hint or justified critique, but he is simply unable to process it and to reflect it on himself just for a second. A tragic figure, but also fascinating. Reminds me a bit of the Drachenlord. The internet should never have opened up for normies.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot G5 X Mark IIImage-Specific Properties:Image Width1080Image Height1620Image Created2024:05:03 00:14:57Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiISO Speed Rating500Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityF-Numberf/4.5Exposure Time1/60 secFocal Length8.80 mmFlashNo FlashMetering ModePatternScene Capture TypeStandardExposure Bias-0.7 EVImage Height1080White BalanceAutoImage Width1620Exposure ModeAutoLens Aperturef/4.6Color Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormal
>>4310263Stick around and wait til you see some more of his threads. He’s basically our resident schizo
>>4310298Cool are we gonna sit around and eat popcorn?
>>4310300Yes, watching you continue to make an absolute fool out of yourself.
>>4310358Okay then, cool.
It's not my fault I appreciate the comfort of men in the eveningThey make me feel secure, loved, cared for.
Leicafags are an interesting species.This is a thread to try and comprehend the minds of these consumerist retards.Their subreddit, the premier place for Leica fans, has a rule explicitly stating that any photos need to "demonstrate a skill or technique that is incredibly difficult to execute correctly, has not been seen before, or both"All the photos in the subreddit do not fit this idiotic criteria, yet are lauded.99% of the posts there are about people buying gear instead of photos.They care more about being seen with a Leica than actually using it.
I'm going to be purchasing a Leica M6 at some point this year.Between the voigtlander 35mm f1.4 nokton and the 35mm f2 ultron which do you Anons recommend?I wouldn't mind the extra light on the nokton, but pic related is shot wide open on it and honestly looks rather ugly. The lens coma is especially pushing me towards the ultron.
>>4311129what the fuck is that
>>4311129i have the nokton but i rarely shoot it wide open. pic related was around f2 i think. never tried the ultron, but that seems more your speed if you don't like messy images
>>4311428Shit that actually looks pretty nice. I guess the worst of the flaws in the design disappear when stopped down. I like somewhat messy images, but the example I posted previously just feels bad, not even interesting. I have seen quite a lot of nice images with the lens wide open as well however.
>>4311584perhaps, but having to stop down in the dark somewhat negates the advantage of the bigger max aperture. not to mention how hard it would be to hit focus at 1.4 in the dark. here's another with the nokton >>4304154. don't remember what f stop but i think you just have to watch out for highlights in the corners on this lens. coma like in the street corner pic you posted doesn't bother me however. the nokton (single coated) is my only m lens rn and i chose it specifically because i wanted the flaws and flares.
ITT: previous work from more than 10 years ago that you shotI'm doing a huge data migration and have had a second look at all of my early stuff when I had a Digital Rebel. I'll post stuff as I get through it and see it. This particular one is 2011.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTiCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)PhotographerunknownMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:03:27 22:09:36Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4310249Wall in Bikkrui Lounge, Orlando Florida.I was ****very**** drunk when I made those
>>4298895You did not take this photo.Egy only photographs random people walking.
>>4299060You gave them a refund, right?Or at least delivered the RAWs so they can not live in cringe forever?It's fine to suck, but giving baked JPEGs only should be a crime.
The more i look at old pictures, the more i think muh image quality is fucking pointless shit in cameras and photography. At least the image quality of today is sufficient. It's just very sophisticated advertisement of the market.
>>4310391lol no, everyone's gotta start somewhere, fine for what they needed at the time, no point in giving raws to a clientshould contribute to the thread and share some of your old work
post photos you've taken on expired filmpicrel is 1000iso 3m colorslide that expired in 1984[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.72.004 (171201)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3119Image Height2075
>>4307078[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
>>4307081[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
>>4306601are you the one who posted the blue building in the train thread
>>4307323I am not, no[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAndroid TP1A.220624.014.N981U1UES6HXC1Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1912Image Height1011
>>4295767I have a handful of expired film. Do you have tips on how to best get results? e.g. wrong iso and do I need to let the developer know about it? Can't remember the details but this is on expired film. I just stuck in in the camera. Kodak something[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.Camera ModelSP-3000Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.24Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:01:13 18:38:21Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1840Image Height1232
