>>4310034
Why do these idiots put the antennae close to their head?

I know a guy who does commercials and shit and he gets brought on set even if they dont need him just in case the crane or the dolly cant quite do the job.

>>4310034
in burgerland? it could've been big if most cities and states didn't basically ban them

>>4310444
What would you prefer? In the ass?

>>4310034
Funnily enough I was thinking the same thing. It looks fun to do and I love high speeds. Are there any good resources for learning how to get good at it? Is there a good beginner drone that's affordable?

>>4313479
based good riddance
canon is the walmart camera

>>4313528
your mom is the walmart woman

canon sent a hitman to cover up allegations of the r1 being delayed yet again

>>4313479
She probably worked for boeing

My only sadness is that it makes it harder to know when preorders will open. The R5 II will likely be sold out for months, so preordering immediately is a must.

>>4313330
If you're foreign, shoot without a warning, call me paparazzi.

>>4313395
That has potential to be a great bar. Work it out and put it on a moonman rap

>>4313415
It's part of a Mr. Bond original: "Supa Nazi".
Catchy as hell.

>>4312896
Use at least 50mm lens (around 80mm is best) or you'll look like shit. If shooting with a phone, zoom in 2-3x since the normal lens is usually equivalent to 24 to 35mm range.
If you don't have lights, do it if a cloudy day to get diffuse light. Sit or stand dead on towards light source (eg. window). Try around noon. Don't even think about shooting with artificial lights that are not studio lights or flashes (like household bulbs, especially CFLs or LEDs), it will look like shit.
Or just don't be a cheap shit and pay $15 to a teenager at CVS to have it done semi-completely.

How is this such a burning question that warrants so much debate? Find a white or very light wall. Try to position a light source so that there isn’t a big shadow behind you.
Take a selfie.
If you need to make changes to dimensions or erase shadow or lighten up the wall to white, most basic photo editing software can do this easy.
I haven’t done a US passport renewal yet, but most countries have switched or have digital forms with photo upload options, so you don’t even need to special print the photos anymore.

>>4301132
Now THAT'S a Texas car. Got a built-in grill XD

File: DSC08416.jpg (1.98 MB, 2048x1365)

1.98 MB JPG

I haven't seen dickbutt in years and yet here it was today staring me in the face from a Supra engine bay.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6700
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	82 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:11 20:28:42
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	5000
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Brightness	2.7 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Daylight
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: DSC00209.jpg (492 KB, 1920x1080)

492 KB JPG

new to photography and this was the first "decent" one to me

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	DSC-W55
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2007:04:11 13:31:24
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/9.0
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	-2 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	9.40 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1920
Image Height	1080
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4301116
idk, this is funny to me. looks like the foreground car is scared and the background car is lurking.

File: DSC09217.jpg (1.56 MB, 2048x1365)

1.56 MB JPG

yab

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6700
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/6.3
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	360 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:12 16:12:56
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/6.3
Brightness	7.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Daylight
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	240.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4306644
I think it's a light breeze fucking up OPs stabilization

>>4307518
This, it looks blurry, and some parts are over-sharpened.

>>4306644
I can tell you definitively that this is a shit image, but whether that's due to "ai slop" in your phone or just general overbaking denoising+sharpening applied I can't say.

The ridiculous banding is what jumps out and screams "shit image, shit shit shit, bad bad!" but yes the "fine details" (there are none) are also shit here.
I don't know what to say other than you must shoot RAW, and avoid proprietary "special"RAW formats and stick with regular RAWs.

>>4309798
The fact he managed to line up the eyepiece and phones camera is mildly impressive IMO. Go try it sometime and see how quickly you loose your shit...

File: 612ER6OZ2bL._AC_SL1500_.jpg (96 KB, 1192x1369)

96 KB JPG

Old Used DSLR + Picrel (T-Ring)

File: P1010732-Edit.jpg (4.48 MB, 3968x2232)

4.48 MB JPG

>>4313448
Berlin skyline.
A lot of the detail was destroyed by the fake Ilford XP2. I think if my camera had more than 12mp it would have worked better.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-LX3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:13 20:08:37
Exposure Time	1/1600 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	250
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	5.10 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: P1080529-Edit.jpg (3.87 MB, 3648x2736)

3.87 MB JPG

>>4313449
This is supposed to be Portra 400.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-LX3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:13 22:50:35
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/3.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	80
Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	7.40 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: P1080550-Edit.jpg (3.36 MB, 3648x2736)

3.36 MB JPG

>>4313451
Cat I met while on a bikeride.
Fake portra 400.
This'll be the last photo I share.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-LX3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:13 22:50:35
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	80
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	12.80 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4313452
>>4313451
Looks nothing like portra, more like “fujifilm digital superia x-tra 800”

File: P1080528-Edit-4.jpg (4.4 MB, 2736x3648)

4.4 MB JPG

>>4313454
Here's a test with "portra 400" without any of the other processing I do in lightroom.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-LX3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:14 01:19:56
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/3.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	80
Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	7.90 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: img016.jpg (1.15 MB, 2858x1896)

1.15 MB JPG

another couple that aren't quite as good but are ok. shot on the minolta p&s as well

File: img017.jpg (1.32 MB, 2844x1884)

1.32 MB JPG

arnr

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Windows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2022:05:19 10:41:46
Color Space Information	sRGB

imgur link: https://imgur.com/a/6jgzhCw

>>4313213
Not much going on
>>4313214
Frustrating composition (cutoff chair and lady, random thing in top left)
>>4313215
Pretty nice. Maybe too much going on, I might've tried to get the building out of the composition but I like this one.

Keep it up.

>>4313228
life is tumblr

>>4313289
>film
Yea no one is paying $50 for a bunch of light leaked out of focus crap sorry. My GRIIIX can upload right to my phone for a quick tweak in LR Mobile and post. The workflow and IQ is amazing for such a small camera that can fit right in my pocket. Have fun waiting on your "scans" to then edit for 2 hours each haha.

>>4306499
>>4306500
>>4306502
>>4306503
Is this bait? This doesn't look like film

>>4313352
film simulators are for retards who son't shoot film and never have or never got drum scans or scanned themselves with good equipment
essentially these are FroPack presets (lol) built into some meme digicams and the retards eat it up

>>4313295
35mm film has 2-3 times the resolution of a ricoh gr and 2-3 more stops of dynamic range

The ricoh gr is stuck in the days when digital wasnt just less soulful - it was lower quality and “solid state” meant “choppy, harsh computery crap” instead of “tolerable but boring and emotionless simulation”.

>>4313386
kiddos born in the early 2000s like awful digital photography because it reminds them of their childhood (back in 2012) and nothing else

if you were born before or after that it sucks and if you were born after that please leave. 12 year olds not wanted here.

>>4313074
1/8000 shutter speed
is
1/14 shutter speed
on nikon z7
each row collects light for 1/8000th of a second
but it takes 1/14th second to sample top row to bottom row
so the overall process, of rolling shutter, makes it a 1/14th shutter speed

you need mechanical shutter to compensate
or CCD
or a nu-global shutter CMOS

cameras have been cucked unnecessarily for so long
rolling shutter is ridiculous

>>4313095
>The phone can get something in focus without a 1 second delay
lol no

>>4313315
>You need mechanical shutter
Well then, problem fucking solved.

Now what's the point of paying out the ass for a global shutter sony when
1: It has the dynamic range of a micro four thirds camera, so bad sony has clear noise reduction cooked into their raws to make the SNR *LOOK* like its only as bad as APS-C (to be fair they are not the only one, canon does a similar thing with... literally every EOS R, usually at low ISOs but its every ISO on the R3, olympus apparently forces color noise reduction in raw and denoising and moire reduction is normally a baked in part of demosaicing xtrans)
2: RED ALREADY HAS AN APS-C GLOBAL SHUTTER SENSOR WITH SEVERAL STOPS MORE DYNAMIC RANGE THAN THE BEST POSSIBLE FULL FRAME CAMERA YOU CAN BUY, FOR THE SAME PRICE, AND IT SHOOTS 16 BIT RAW (IS JAPAN EVEN FUCKING TRYING?)
(hot takes ahead, some plane spotting autist might be mad, and some gearfag autist whose ego is based on racking up debt to buy an R3 might be madder)
3: The readout of a mechanical shutter, or a MS-speed eshutter (Z8, R3) is already excessively fast for anything but specific motorsports, which is honestly a boring, soulless non-artistic waste of time of no more value than blurry phone snaps taken of the exact same thing and you should feel bad for being enough of an autistic bugman to want to photograph it with a $6000 camera.
4: Anything over 10FPS is of 0 use for anything but PROFESSIONAL sports photography where things like the very moment a golf club hits a ball are valuable. Again this is a soulless endeavor. it is impossible for it to be art. you should feel bad for wanting to photograph this. This is the domain of engineers playing with high speed cameras that they would normally use for testing and research making an appearance on an informational youtube video/mythbusters or some shit, not "REAL" photographers (artists). Perhaps 12fps, but much faster and we're getting into the territory where strobes recycle times can't keep up.

File: -1x-1.jpg (398 KB, 2000x1334)

398 KB JPG

>>4313319
>RED ALREADY HAS
*Nikon already has

RED just asked for the sensor, towejazz designed and built it. Then Nikon asked for RED and everything they had, including their supplier contracts with towerjazz.

kekekeke

>>4313319
muh mechanical simplicity
muh indestructible electronics

>>4313111
he is using "finesse" in an obscure way, similar to 'trick' or 'con'. It implies you are being 'finessed' into accepting something you shouldn't.

>>4313112
Color is mostly determined by the lens
Then the CFA specs and proprietary raw cooking
Then by the raw converters settings
Then by the display medium and room lighting

Imagine if you could not shoot raw. One camera equals one film stock. Not happy? New camera time or gearfag over lens color transmission until the end of time.

Also, AWB fucking up? Always. Have fun manually setting white balance all the time.

Oh wait thats how fujislug consoomers actually live
>omg must buy for the new film sim!

>>4313125
all that and it gets worse
8 bit color, 10 with limited compatibility, thats it
lossy format
being stuck with whatever shitty “sharpening” and “chroma/luma nr” the camera maker could fit on the shitty low-power chips that cameras must use in the name of battery life
if moire or fujiworms happen you are stuck with that

negative film unironically had more editing latitude and general utility than jpeg
jpeg = digital is worse than film period. only a fucking retard would accept this trash. 1hr photo automated printing does a better job. all digital photography looks like godawful soulless shit.
raw = ok, now digital is as good as consumer 35mm film… if you have like, 36mp, at least.

people mostly my age have no idea how much worse the average digital camera is compared to a $15 roll of portra in a cheapo nikon slr

>>4313127
Well you know, it's all about the right tool for the job. They want to have pictures of things, while you're out shopping for a personality that'll be like all cool and artsy and special and stuff to sate that desperate need at the core of your being. (Don't worry, it usually sates itself around the mid twenties.)

>>4313136
The bitchy insult at the end is an auto-L. Couldnt be more low test if you tried.
>dont do things well! dont care! Do the minimim AESTHETICS ARE IMMORAL
OK enjoy your drab box church, solid black outfit, and phone photos jebediah.

File: 1715298033303853.jpg (1.62 MB, 2048x1362)

1.62 MB JPG

>>4312241
added ur noise back

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:10 18:36:27
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4312570
>>4312575
anyone have some good tips for editing reds? They always seem to look off to me

>>4312590
Just use the dropper tool and toy around with the different reds.

>>4312582
I won’t screw with the noise from now on. 4R80

File: Wilson's Warbler-2.jpg (2.68 MB, 2500x1475)

2.68 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON Z 8
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 7.2 (Windows)
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	866
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	600 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:12 10:33:28
Exposure Time	1/1250 sec
F-Number	f/9.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1400
Lens Aperture	f/9.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	600.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>4312030
I have a d60 and d7200.
I'm just curious for something that I can keep in my car or laying around the house or for like a birthday party, something that isn't my phone, I don't want to buy flagship phones anymore. And I thought a camera like the J1 would offer an alternative. I'm also more inclined to actually post or keep photos from a camera than my phone since I'm used to taking large amount of photos from my DLSRs and such.

>>4312023
The 1 series I think was made in Thailand, that was around the time Nikon started to really export production.

File: DSC_0465.jpg (2.17 MB, 3761x2518)

2.17 MB JPG

>>4312147
at least its not saskatchewan. this thread got me lookin up V1s on ebay, man, fuck.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON 1 V1
Camera Software	Aperture 3.4.3
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2013:04:08 16:14:28
Exposure Time	1/3200 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	10.00 mm
Image Width	3761
Image Height	2518
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>4312303

Yeah I guess vomit is slightly better than shit

File: 1000002147.jpg (2.87 MB, 1366x2048)

2.87 MB JPG

>>4310777
>>4312017
yeah these things suck balls, better sell them to me.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON 1 V3
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.0 (Android)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	810 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:23 05:02:37
Exposure Time	1/500 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	6400
Lens Aperture	f/6.3
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	300.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 1000002148.jpg (2.08 MB, 1366x2048)

2.08 MB JPG

>>4310744
to actually answer your question OP, i love nikon 1 shit, people can complain about small sensor size whatever but the real killer is lens selection, Nikon made fuck all and there's almost zero third party shit and the stuff that is available is in focal lengths that don't match the awkward 2.7 crop ratio.

Save yourself the grief and either get an e-p1 for $50 and have the whole catalogue of m4/3 lenses available or get an e-m10 mk1 if you really need the viewfinder. Or a Panasonic but i don't know what models.

That being said, the 1 niggor 70-300 is really fucking good.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON 1 V3
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.0 (Android)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	810 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:14 17:27:30
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	300.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>424103 pdf file alert

>>4299134
See what?

>>4254822
damn
british roses are even ugly at young age

Now post the last known photograph of a little girl

bump

File: 5ADCF92A-8396-439F-AE2A-2(...).jpg (2.41 MB, 4032x3024)

2.41 MB JPG

This is a nice one

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Bottom, Right-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: C2AED29C-B8B0-4810-A509-1(...).jpg (2.18 MB, 4032x3024)

2.18 MB JPG

Bazinga

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 3CD57CC1-BAE1-4CB7-8D71-9(...).jpg (1.57 MB, 4032x3024)

1.57 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 0B8FAA14-11EE-437C-BCF7-2(...).jpg (1.92 MB, 4032x3024)

1.92 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Scene Capture Type	Standard

At least you aren't oversaturating them in post like NPCs. I've seen them up north many times and the shots you're seeing on the news are basically fake.

>>4311741
>How to sweat to death and weigh a ton at the same time.
Deck is 100% cotton. So no, you won't sweat to death.
They used to have that issue with some other jackets with plastic parts but I haven't faced with this problem to be honest.

>>4307613
Get an Austrian M65, I have one from 1984.
It's heavy as fuck but has infinite pocket space, is basically waterproof, and is peak comfy.
For an idea of pocket capacity, I can store about 3 pints of beer in each bottom pocket and 1 pint in each top pocket.
Jacket looks like your pic but less gay and probably 10x cheaper.

What you gonna do when it’s too hot for a jacket?

>>4311899
Its still waxed cotton, which means it doesnt breath. So you will be prone to getting cold easier and hot easier. Also, enjoy getting wax all over your camera bag. Waxed cotton coats are obsolete. The realm of farmers now, because they can be repaired. Wealthy people wear them to make it look like they own a house in the country. But they generally dont.

I used to work for Barbour lol.

File: Reuters_Korean_Dog_Meat_S(...).png (657 KB, 639x633)

657 KB PNG

>>4312868
Eat a dog.